We hypothesize that there is no difference in clinical and radiological outcome when using PSG for UKA compared with results from the literature describing results from conventional UKA surgical techniques.
ID
Bron
Verkorte titel
Aandoening
This cohort study will evaluate patients who have been operated for knee arthroplasty (UKA) according to the Signature alignment method.
Ondersteuning
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
Uitkomstmaten
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Implant alignment and survival
Achtergrond van het onderzoek
Recently, patient-specific guiding (PSG) was introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and UKA. It is believed but not yet proven that this technique aids in improvement of prosthesis position but also in decreasing operation time
and decreasing blood loss. However, limited literature is present on PSG in UKA
Doel van het onderzoek
We hypothesize that there is no difference in clinical and radiological outcome when using PSG for UKA compared with results from the literature describing results from conventional UKA surgical techniques.
Onderzoeksopzet
preoperative and follow-up at 3 months, 1 and 2-years
Onderzoeksproduct en/of interventie
A relatively new technique for the perioperative alignment of prosthesis components inunicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is the use of patient-specific guiding (PSG). The guides used in this technique are made of synthetic material, custom-made using MR imaging to fit anatomical landmarks of femur and tibia of a certain patient. These guides assist the surgeon in placing the implant in an anatomic fashion. Precision in implant placement restores biomechanics of the knee joint and should increase longevity of the prosthesis
Publiek
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
Wetenschappelijk
M.G.M. Schotanus
Geleen 6162 BG
The Netherlands
+31 (0)88 4597823
m.schotanus@zuyderland.nl
Belangrijkste voorwaarden om deel te mogen nemen (Inclusiecriteria)
• Patients who received UKA using PSG
• Patients who complete the preoperative and follow-up at 3 months, 1 and 2-years
• Patients of whom digital radiographs are available
Belangrijkste redenen om niet deel te kunnen nemen (Exclusiecriteria)
• Patients who failed to complete follow-up
• Patients of whom no digital radiographs are available
• Patients of whom digital radiographs are of poor quality
Opzet
Deelname
Voornemen beschikbaar stellen Individuele Patiënten Data (IPD)
Opgevolgd door onderstaande (mogelijk meer actuele) registratie
Geen registraties gevonden.
Andere (mogelijk minder actuele) registraties in dit register
Geen registraties gevonden.
In overige registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL6262 |
| NTR-old | NTR6436 |
| Ander register | METC : 16-N-106 |
Samenvatting resultaten
Leenders AM, Schotanus MGM, Wind RJP, Borghans RAP, Kort NP.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3491-3498. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4956-9