14 results
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BIBF 1120 in HCC patients without prior systemic treatment as compared to Sorafenib.
Earlier research nas shown the emerging efficacy and safety profile for INC424, which supports further studies in PV subjects who demonstrate resistance or intolerance to HU therapy [Barosi et al.2009]. This pivotal phase III trial (CINC424B2301) is…
To establish the MTD and/or recommended phase II dose of the coadministration of LDE225 and INC424 in patients with MF, who have not previously received therapy with a JAK inhibitor
- To asses the safety and toxicity of peri-ablative sorafenib given in doses of either 200 mg or 400 mg twice daily.- To asses the effect of perioperative sorafenib on the RFA induced mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells and cytokines…
To assess the rate of complete response (CR) in Grades III and IV SR-aGVHD participants on Day 28 postrandomization.
Primary Objectives:- To evaluate and compare the overall survival (OS) of subjects with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas when treated with JAK 1/2 Inhibitor in combination with capecitabine versus capecitabine alone.Secondary…
Primary Objectives:• Part 1: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib in combination with pemetrexed/cisplatin and select a dose for further evaluation• Part 2: To evaluate and compare the overall survival of subjects with nonsquamous…
Primary: To estimate the MTD and/or RDE for each of the following three treatment arms in patients with myelofibrosis.* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* Ribociclib (LEE011) plus ruxolitinib (doublet)* PIM447 plus ruxolitinib and Ribociclib (LEE011…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with grade II-IV steroid refractory- acute graft vs host disease assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Day 28.Secondary:…
The purpose of the study intends to assess safety, activity and pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib treatment with corticosteroids in treatment-naïve and steroid refractory (SR)- acute Graft versus Host Disease (aGvHD) patients aged *28 days to <…
Primary: To compare the efficacy of ruxolitinib versus Investigator*s choice Best Available Therapy (BAT) in patients with moderate or severe SR-cGvHD assessed by Overall Response Rate (ORR) at the Cycle 7 Day 1 visit.Secondary: To compare the rate…
The revised aims of the SORCE trial are:1. Does up to three years of treatment with sorafenib increase DFS compared with placebo: a comparison of Arm C vs Arm A2. If the answer to question (i) is yes, does one year of sorafenib (Arm B) increase DFS…
To characterize the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of each combination partner used with ruxolitinib (Part 1)To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of each novel ruxolitinib combination treatment arm (Parts 2 & 3)
To demonstrate the benefit of maintenance treatment with avelumab plus BSC vs. BSC alone in prolonging overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC whose disease did not progress on or following completion of…