Earlier research nas shown the emerging efficacy and safety profile for INC424, which supports further studies in PV subjects who demonstrate resistance or intolerance to HU therapy [Barosi et al.2009]. This pivotal phase III trial (CINC424B2301) is…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Haematological disorders NEC
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To compare the efficacy of INC424 to Best Available Therapy as assessed by both
the absence of phlebotomy eligibility and reduction in spleen volume
Secondary outcome
To compare the proportion of subjects randomized to INC424 vs Best Available
Therapy achieving both durable absence of phlebotomy eligibility and durable
spleen volume reduction
To compare the proportion of subjects randomized to INC424 vs Best Available
Therapy achieving complete hematologic remission
Background summary
Polycythemia Vera (PV) is classified as a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)
along with two other BCR-ABL-negative MPNs, myelofibrosis (MF) and essential
thrombocythemia (ET) [Vardiman et al, 2009]. The recent observation of the
association between mutations in the Janus Kinase 2 (JAK2) enzyme and MPNs has
added a genetic dimension to the diagnosis [Levine and Wernig, 2006]. Virtually
all patients with PV have a mutation in JAK2, and more than 95% carry the V617F
allele. The current therapeutic approach in PV focuses on lowering the risk for
thrombotic events without exposing patients to increased risk of leukemic
transformation [Finazzi and Barbui 2008]. While phlebotomy and low dose
aspirin are accepted as the standard of care for initial therapy, cytoreductive
therapy is recommended to aid in the control of erythrocytosis in the presence
of poor tolerance to phlebotomy, symptomatic or progressive splenomegaly, or
evidence of high thrombotic risk [Finazzi and Barbui 2007].Therapeutic options
in the second-line setting, beyond HU, are limited (pipobroman, busulfan,
chlorambucil, Peginterferon/interferon alpha, 32P, anagrelide), and as a
consequence, it is estimated that up to 20% of patients may continue on HU even
though response is less than satisfactory [Najean and Rain, 1997].
Study objective
Earlier research nas shown the emerging efficacy and safety profile for INC424,
which supports further studies in PV subjects who demonstrate resistance or
intolerance to HU therapy [Barosi et al.2009]. This pivotal phase III trial
(CINC424B2301) is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of INC424 to Best
Available Therapy (BAT) in PV subjects. The purpose of this trial is to
demonstrate clinically meaningful responses in PV subjects receiving INC424
(i.e., response and durability rates of concomitant spleen volume reduction and
phlebotomy independence; complete hematological remission; complete or partial
responses according to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) modified criteria and their
durability).
Study design
This is a global, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III study comparing
the efficacy and safety of INC424 tablets to Best Available Therapy, as
selected by the investigator, in subjects with PV who are resistant to or
intolerant of hydroxyurea. The randomization target for this study is 200
subjects. Subjects will be randomly assigned to either Treatment Arm 1:
Investigational drug; or Treatment Arm 2: BAT in a 1:1 ratio, with
randomization stratified by HU resistance or HU intolerance as categorized at
the Screening visit.
During the Treatment Phase, Cross Over from Treatment Arm 2 to Treatment Arm 1
may be possible. The reverse is prohibited in this study
Intervention
Subjects will self-administer daily INC424 tablets as instructed, starting dose
10 mg bid (approximately 12 hours apart : morning and night), to be increased
or decreased (5 or 10mg steps) per standardized dosing paradigm
Subjects in the Control group will receive Best Available Therapy according to
a treatment prescribed by the investigator on a subject-by-subject basis. This
treatment will be a monotherapy. The single agent will be selected among the
following categories of drugs: HU (at a tolerated dose if, in the opinion of
the investigator, the subject is likely to receive benefit),
interferon/pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide and approved
immunomodulators (imids: lenalidomide, thalidomide, etc.). The Best Available
Therapy may include no treatment at all (i.e. absence of treatment apart from
phlebotomy when the subject is eligible).
Study burden and risks
INC424 has been administered in single or multiple doses to over 200 healthy
subjects. In single dose studies, INC424 has been safe and well tolerated with
Adverse Events (AEs) generally mild in intensity, reversible and of similar
incidence following INC424 treatment compared with placebo or with other
control treatments. INC424 has been well tolerated in an advanced disease PV
population. Most Adverse Events have been mild in severity and considered
unrelated to study drug. Grade 2 treatment related Adverse Events occurring in
at least two subjects were anemia (4 subjects; 12%), leucopenia (3 subjects;
9%), palpitations (2 subjects; 6%), and dyspnea (2 subjects; 6%). One subject
(3%) experienced a Grade 2 thrombocytopenia and one subject (3%) experienced a
Grade 3 thrombocytopenia. There have been no Grade 4 treatment related Adverse
Events. Anemia, leucopenia and thrombocytopenia represent JAK
inhibitor-induced myelosuppression, and are generally reversible with INC424
dose modification. Total visit number is not much higher than in clinical
practise, and includes routine blood sampling. Additional is a maximum of 6 MRI
sessions to measure spleen volume. The risk associated with this procedure is
minimal.
Raapopseweg 1
Arnhem 6824 DP
NL
Raapopseweg 1
Arnhem 6824 DP
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
1. Subjects 18 years of age or older.
2. Subjects must be diagnosed with PV for at least 24 weeks prior to Screening according to
the 2008 World Health Organization criteria (Table 2 in Tefferi and Vardiman 2008;
Appendix 1).
3. Subjects must have a treatment history for PV that meets the definition of resistance or
intolerance to hydroxyurea (HU) by exhibiting at least one of the following five criteria
(modified from Barosi et al 2009A, Appendix 2):
* HU Resistance, defined after 12 weeks into a course of HU therapy at a dose of at least
2 grams/day OR at the subject*s maximally tolerated dose if that dose is less than 2
grams/day:
a. Need for phlebotomy to keep hematocrit < 45%, OR
b. Platelet count > 400 x 109/L AND white blood cell count > 10 x 109/L, OR
c. Failure to reduce splenomegaly extending greater than 10 cm below the costal
margin by more than 50%, as measured by palpation.
* HU Intolerance:
a. Absolute neutrophil count < 1.0 x 109/L OR platelet count < 100 x 109/L OR
hemoglobin < 100 g/L (i.e. 10 g/dL) at the lowest dose of HU required to achieve a response (with response modified from Barosi et al 2009B: hematocrit < 45%
without phlebotomy AND/OR all of the following three items: platelet count
* 400 x 109/L, white blood cell count * 10 x 109/L, and non-palpable spleen), OR
b. Presence of leg ulcers or other unacceptable HU-related non-hematological
toxicities (such as mucocutaneous manifestations, gastrointestinal symptoms,
pneumonitis or fever at any dose of HU), defined as
- CTCAE version 3.0 Grade 3-4, OR
- more than 1 week of CTCAE version 3.0 Grade 2, OR
- permanent discontinuation of HU, OR
- interruption of HU until toxicity resolved, OR
- hospitalization due to HU toxicity.
4. Subjects must have required
a. at least 2 phlebotomies within the 24 weeks prior to Screening, AND
b. at least one phlebotomy within the 16 weeks prior to Screening, AND
c. the most distant and the most recent phlebotomy within the 24 weeks prior to
Screening must be at least 4 weeks apart
OR subjects will be considered to have met this criterion if they have required a
phlebotomy within the 16 weeks prior to Screening AND they exhibit a hematocrit
> 45% at Screening
5. Subjects with splenomegaly, defined as
a. Spleen palpable below the costal margin, provided that MRI (or CT in applicable
subjects) spleen assessment during Screening confirms that the spleen is enlarged,
defined with a volume of * 450 cm3, OR
b. Spleen non palpable below the costal margin due to body habitus (e.g., in obese
subjects), provided that MRI (or CT in applicable subjects) spleen assessment during
Screening confirms that the spleen is enlarged, defined with a volume of * 450 cm3
6. Subjects with ANC * 1.5 x 109/L and PLT * 100 x 109/L at Screening.
7. Subjects with peripheral blood blast count of 0% at Screening.
8. Subjects with an ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2 (Appendix 5) at Screening and
Baseline.
9. Subjects on a therapeutic regimen for PV must have been on a stable dose and schedule
for at least 2 weeks prior to Screening and no less than 4 weeks prior to randomization
(Study Day 1).
Exclusion criteria
1. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women, where pregnancy is defined as the state of a female
after conception (confirmed by a positive hCG laboratory test ;> 5 mIU/mL) and until the
termination of gestation.
2. Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of
becoming pregnant, including women whose career, lifestyle, or sexual orientation
precludes intercourse with a male partner and women whose partners have been sterilized
by vasectomy or other means, UNLESS they are using two birth control methods. The two
methods can be a double barrier method or a barrier method plus a hormonal method.
(Appendix 3).
* Reliable contraception should be maintained throughout the study and for 5-half lives
of study drug after study treatment discontinuation.
* Women are considered post-menopausal and not of child bearing potential if they
have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical
profile (e.g. age appropriate, history of vasomotor symptoms) or six months of
spontaneous amenorrhea with serum FSH levels > 40 mIU/mL [for US only: and
estradiol < 20 pg/mL] or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without
hysterectomy) at least six weeks ago. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when
the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level
assessment is she considered not of child bearing potential.
* Sexually active males must use a condom during intercourse while taking the drug
and for five half-lives after stopping treatment and should not father a child in this
period. A condom is required to be used also by vasectomized men in order to prevent
delivery of the drug via seminal fluid.
3. Subjects with inadequate liver or renal function at Screening as demonstrated by:
a. Encephalopathy Grade 2 or more as per Child-Pugh System. (Appendix 12)
b. Known hepatocellular disease (for example, hepatitis B or C, cirrhosis or other
hepatocellular disease)
c. Direct bilirubin * 2 X upper limit of laboratory normal (ULN).
d. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2.5x ULN.
e. MDRD-eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73m2 or on dialysis.
4. Subjects with impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may
significantly alter the absorption of oral INC424 (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled
nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection).
5. Subjects with clinically significant bacterial, fungal, parasitic or viral infection which
requires therapy:
* Subjects with acute bacterial infections requiring antibiotic use should delay
screening/enrollment until the course of antibiotic therapy has been completed.
* Subjects with known active hepatitis A, B or C at Screening or with known HIV
positivity.
6. Subjects with diagnosed primary immunodeficiency syndromes such as X-Linked
Agammaglobulinemia and Common Variable Immune Deficiency.
7. Subjects with an active malignancy over the previous 5 years except treated cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia, basal cell carcinoma of the skin, or squamous cell carcinoma of
the skin, with no evidence for recurrence in the past 3 years.
8. Subjects with clinically significant cardiac disease (NYHA Class III or IV; Appendix 6).
9. Subjects receiving PEG-IFN-alpha-2a within 5 weeks of Screening or having a prior
history of 32P therapy.
10. Subjects being treated concurrently with a potent systemic inhibitor of CYP3A4 at the
time of Screening (ketoconazole, clarithromycin, itraconazole, nefazodone or
telithromycin, see Appendix 13).
11. Subjects being treated concurrently with any prohibited medications (see Section 5.1.11
for specific prohibited medications and the associated timeframe over which they are
prohibited).
12. Subjects who have previously received treatment with a JAK inhibitor.
13. Subjects being treated concurrently with any investigational agent or prior participation in
an investigational study within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug or within 5-
half lives of the investigational product, whichever is longer.
14. Subjects who are unable to comprehend or are unwilling to sign an informed consent form
(ICF).
15. Subjects with active alcohol or drug addiction that would interfere with their ability to
comply with the study requirements.
16. Subjects with an uncontrolled intercurrent illness or any concurrent condition that, in the
investigator*s opinion, would jeopardize the safety of the subject or compliance with the
protocol.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2010-020807-57-NL |
CCMO | NL34536.078.11 |