Primary Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of AET in the inpatient treatment of AN through qualitative feedback from patients and clinicians.Secondary Objective(s): To identify autonomy-related interventions currently already…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Eating disorders and disturbances
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
In a qualitative study focusing on acceptability and feasibility, the main
study parameters are the key themes and sub-themes that emerge from the
interview data. These themes reflect participants' perceptions and experiences
of AET, and any identified barriers or facilitators relat-ed to the
acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.
Secondary outcome
Not applicable
Background summary
The treatment of anorexia nervosa (AN) in inpatient settings faces significant
challenges, partic-ularly due to patients* initial low intrinsic motivation to
recover. Enhancing autonomous motiva-tion, where patients actively choose
recovery, is crucial for long-term success.
Autonomy-enhancing therapy (AET) and the concept of autonomy-connectedness (AC)
may address these issues. AC encompasses self-awareness, sensitivity to others,
and the ability to manage new situations, and AET strengthens a healthy
autonomy. By helping patients develop a stronger sense of self and explore
their personal values, AET could encourage greater auton-omy and engagement in
treatment.
Despite AET*s potential benefits, its use in the inpatient setting may seems to
be at odds with the need to adhere to mandatory treatment protocols and
treatment non-negotiables (Conti et al., 2020). However, reframing this
adherence as a healthy, autonomous request for help may provide a more
acceptable start of treatment. So, although AET may be a promising addition to
AN-treatment, its suitability for the inpatient setting remains to be
determined.
Study objective
Primary Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of AET in the
inpatient treatment of AN through qualitative feedback from patients and
clinicians.
Secondary Objective(s): To identify autonomy-related interventions currently
already in use within the clinic and translate these into
autonomy-connectedness terms.
Study design
Qualitative acceptability and feasibility study, using semi-structured
interviews
Study burden and risks
Participants are already residing in the clinic, and the sessions will replace
regular treatment sessions, resulting in a low burden. Since this involves a
standard and evidence-based treatment method that has only not yet been tested
in this specific patient context, the risk is also low.
De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
De Boelelaan 1105
Amsterdam 1081 HV
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
Patients: speaking Dutch, being an inpatient at GGZ Oost Brabant, being 18
years or older
Healthy participants: working in inpatient ED care at GGZ Oost Brabant.
Exclusion criteria
Not speaking Dutch
Any on-going crisis
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL88077.028.24 |