The primary objective of this study is to answer if patient-specific osteosynthesis increases the accuracy and predictability of 3D planned orthognathic bimax surgery compared to conventional bimax surgery using the mandible-first approach and mini-…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
Dysgnate afwijking
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The primary endpoint for this study is the geometrical change on dentition
level. The baseline is the planned position, compared with the post-operative
final position determined from CBCT. CBCT*s of the maxillofacial region will be
made according to care as usual in our clinic; pre-operative, 1-wk
post-operative, 1-yr post-operative.
Secondary outcome
N.v.t.
Background summary
In orthognathic surgery, patients with a dysgnatic deformity are operated to
correct their functional and esthetical problems by realigning the upper or
lower jaw. In a selection of orthognathic patients, both the upper and lower
jaw are operated on (bimaxillary surgery). A much debated question in the field
of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery is the order of sequencing, either
maxilla-first or mandibula-first. Traditionally, the maxilla is first operated
on, followed by the mandible. Theoretically a mandible first approach could be
more precise due to a better condylair seating of the mandible then positioning
of the maxilla. However, reviewing literature on orthognathic sequencing, there
still seems to be limited consensus on which approach can provide the most
predictable result. Currently, the decision is dependent on surgeons experience
and preference.
Recently, we have shown accurate and promising results using patient specific
guides and osteosynthesis material to dictate the movement of the maxilla.
Seeing the limited consensus in literature on the best sequencing approach, the
question is raised whether patient specific osteosynthesis can increases the
accuracy and predictability of 3D planned orthognathic surgery bimaxillary
surgery. Indications for the use of conventional maxilla-first, conventional
mandible-first or a PSO approach are lacking. Current data on the accuracy of
mandible-first surgery and PSO are not directly comparable, as such an analysis
has not yet been reported.
Study objective
The primary objective of this study is to answer if patient-specific
osteosynthesis increases the accuracy and predictability of 3D planned
orthognathic bimax surgery compared to conventional bimax surgery using the
mandible-first approach and mini-plate fixation. The secondary objective of
this study is to answer if patient-specific osteosynthesis influences the
one-year follow-up skeletal stability of the maxillary segment compared to
conventional ostoesynthesis using mini-plate fixation
Study design
In order to test the difference in accuracy of translation of 3D virtual
planning and predictability of outcome, this study requires a randomised
controlled prospective trial design. The control group will receive
conventional 3D virtually planned mandible-first translation guided by 3D
splints and fixed with conventional osteosynthesis and the intervention group
will receive 3D virtually planned translation guided patient specifically using
maxillary drill- and saw guides and patient specific osteosynthesis
materials.
Intervention
The intervention in this study is an osteotomy of the upper and lower jaw
(bimaxillary osteotomy), performed using patient specific drill- and saw guides
and patient specific osteosynthesis of the maxilla in the intervention group.
The control group will receive a care as usual mandible-first osteotomy using
splints and conventional osteosynthesis.
Study burden and risks
The surgical procedure will not be subject to substantial changes for the
patient. The patient-specific osteosynthesis applies to the maxilla, so these
patients will be first operated on the maxilla followed by the mandible.
Conventional patients will be first operated on the mandible, followed by the
maxilla. Besides a change is sequencing, no differences in surgical procedure
are made. No larger incision will be made and no differences in the used
materials are planned besides the osteosynthesis (fixation) materials. The
patient specific fixation plates are fabricated out of CE-medical grade (V)
titanium by an ISO13485 and ISO 9001:2008 certified manufacturer (Createch
Medical, Mendaro Spain). The surgical guides are fabricated out of a plastic
(nylon), which is sterilisation proof, frequently used in surgeries. No
additional materials are used in the surgical procedure, despite the method
that is used (conventional or patient specific). As an escape procedure, in
case of the patient specific osteosynthesis, the regular 3D milled splint is
made for every patient as well. The regular titanium osteosynthesis can thereby
be applied at any time if the circumstances require this.
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713 GZ
NL
Hanzeplein 1
Groningen 9713 GZ
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
• The patient is awaiting orthognathic surgical treatment, namely: bimaxillary
osteotomies (upper and lower jaw) as part of their treatment plan;
• The patient is at least 18 years of age. Completion of physical growth is a
routine criterion for orthognathic surgery;
Exclusion criteria
• Patient does not agree to randomized application of osteosynthesis method;
• Pregnancy, which is a general contraindication for orthognathic surgery;
• Known allergy to titanium
• Patient is, for any reason, not able to undergo the 3D virtual planning
procedure, including double dentition imprints/intra-oral scan, pre-operative
CBCT scanning and virtual planning of translations. An example could be the
inability to complete the dental imprint of both upper and lower jaw, or
inadequate scanning of the patient. These examples will. If applicable, come up
during the preparation appointment with the patient, and therefore do not delay
the patient*s trajectory.
• Patient has a cleft lip or cleft palate
• Patient has a syndrome associated with craniofacial anomalies
• The operation of the patient includes a multisegmental Le Fort 1 osteotomy of
the maxilla
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL74996.042.20 |