This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-504996-26-00 check the CTIS register for the current data. The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy, measured by OS, of capivasertib + docetaxel versus placebo + docetaxel,…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
Synonym
Health condition
Prostate Cancer
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of
capivasertib in addition to docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel in patients
with mCRPC.
Primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel
relative to placebo + docetaxel by assessment of overall survival (OS) in
patients with mCRPC in the overall population.
See Section 3 of the Protocol AM1
Secondary outcome
Key secundary are
- To demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel relative to placebo +
docetaxel by assessment of OS in patients with mCRPC and PTEN proficient
tumours (IHC).
- To demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel relative to placebo +
docetaxel by assessment of OS in patients with mCRPC and PTEN deficient tumours
(IHC).
-To demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel relative to placebo +
docetaxel by assessment of radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) in
patients with mCRPC in the overall population.
- To demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel relative to placebo +
docetaxel by assessment of time to pain progression (TTPP) in patients
with*mCRPC in the overall population .
- To demonstrate superiority of capivasertib + docetaxel relative to placebo +
docetaxel by assessment of time to first Symptomatic Skeletal-Related Event
(SSRE) in patients with* mCRPC in the overall population.
See Section 3 of the Protocol AM1
Background summary
Capivasertib, a novel pyrrolopyrimidine-derived compound, is a potent and
selective oral inhibitor of all 3 isoforms of AKT (Davies et al 2012). A
randomized Phase 2 study (150 patients, randomised 1:1) has suggested that in
patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), addition
of capivasertib therapy to the standard treatment regimen of docetaxel (with
corticosteroid and on a background of continued androgen deprivation therapy
[ADT]) may confer a survival improvement versus that seen with docetaxel alone
(Crabbe et al 2020). Given the short life expectancy in general of men with
mCRPC, there is an important unmet medical need for additional treatments for
men with mCRPC that are able to improve survival. The combination of
capivasertib with a taxane chemotherapy in Phase 2 studies was generally well
tolerated, with a manageable safety profile, appropriate for the settings.
This Phase 3 study is planned in response to positive Phase 2 results and aims
to provide confirmatory evidence of the efficacy and safety of capivasertib in
combination with docetaxel versus placebo + docetaxel as treatment for patients
with mCRPC.
Study objective
This study has been transitioned to CTIS with ID 2023-504996-26-00 check the CTIS register for the current data.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy, measured by OS,
of capivasertib + docetaxel versus placebo + docetaxel, with both groups
receiving continuous ADT. The primary endpoint is OS in patients who have mCRPC
and have received prior next generation hormonal agent (abiraterone,
enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide). The effect of capivasertib versus
placebo will be tested using a log rank test stratified by the randomisation
stratification factors. If there are insufficient events per strata, some
strata will be collapsed following rules to be pre-specified in the statistical
analysis plan (SAP). From a stratified Cox proportional hazards model, the HR
(capivasertib + docetaxel versus placebo + docetaxel) together with its
corresponding confidence interval (CI) will be presented. A HR < 1 will favour
capivasertib + docetaxel.
The key secondary endpoints of radiological progression-free survival (rPFS),
symptomatic skeletal-related event (SSRE), and time to pain progression (TTPP)
will be tested following a multiple testing procedure (MTP) to preserve the
overall type 1 error (familywise error rate) in the strong sense. Each key
secondary endpoint will be analysed once only, with rPFS and TTPP analysed at
the interim OS analysis, and SSRE analysed at the final OS analysis.
See Section 3 of Study Protocol AM1
Study design
This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled,
parallel-group, global study, designed to compare the efficacy and safety of
capivasertib versus placebo, when added to docetaxel (+ corticosteroid and on a
background of continued ADT) in patients with mCRPC who have already received a
next generation hormonal agent (abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, or
darolutamide), either as treatment for hormone sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC)
or CRPC.
Patients will be recruited globally from approximately 23 countries and
approximately 192 study sites in Europe, North America, South America,
Australia, and Asia (including China and Japan).
Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either capivasertib or
matching placebo, in combination with docetaxel (+ corticosteroid as per
standard practice at site) on a background of ADT. The randomisation scheme
will be stratified on the following factors:
** Received two or more lines of prior next generation hormonal agents, with at
least one line of next generation hormonal agent used in a CRPC setting (yes vs
no)
** Visceral metastases present (yes vs no)
** Geographic location: Region 1: North America, Western Europe, and Australia
Region 2: Latin America and Eastern EuropeRegion 3: Asia.
See Section 4 of Study Protocol AM1
Intervention
Study treatment options:
Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio (capivasertib + docetaxel:
placebo + docetaxel)
See section 6 of Study Protocol AM1
Study burden and risks
The combination of docetaxel and capivasertib is anticipated to improve
survival in men with mCRPC compared with docetaxel alone
Capivasertib has demonstrated clinical activity in several cancer settings with
ongoing Phase 3 studies in patients with breast and prostate cancer. Clinical
and non-clinical data with capivasertib support the hypothesis that AKT
inhibition may be a valid treatment strategy for mCRPC. The utility of this
combination is further supported by the results from a randomised Phase 2 study
showing improvement in the capivasertib plus docetaxel arm compared with
docetaxel alone with a tolerable safety profile.
Safety data with capivasertib is largely derived from monotherapy and
combination studies in
patients with advanced solid malignancies, especially breast cancer and
prostate cancer.
In the capivasertib clinical programme to date the safety profile has been
consistent across
combinations with no combination or indication-specific adverse drug reactions
(ADRs)
identified.
See protocol AM1, Part 2.3 Benefit/Risk and Investigator Brochure Ed 14
- - - -
- - - -
SE
- - - -
- - - -
SE
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Histologically-confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma without predominant
neuroendocrine or small cell cancers
- Metastatic disease documented prior to randomisation by clear evidence of >= 1
bone lesion (defined as 1 lesion with positive uptake on bone scan) and/or >= 1
soft tissue lesion (measurable or non-measurable)
- Patient must have been previously treated with a next generation hormonal
agent (NHA), ie, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide or darolutamide, for
prostate cancer for at least 3 months and shown evidence of disease progression
(radiological or via PSA assessment) while receiving the NHA
- Evidence of mCRPC with progression of disease despite androgen deprivation
therapy (ADT)
- Serum testosterone level <= 50 ng/dL
- Candidate for docetaxel and steroid therapy
- Ongoing ADT with LHRH agonist, LHRH antagonist, or bilateral orchiectomy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/World Health Organisation (WHO)
performance status 0 to 1 and anticipated minimum life expectancy of 12 weeks
- Confirmation that archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumour
tissue sample which meets the minimum pathology and sample requirements is
available to send to the central laboratory
- Able and willing to swallow and retain oral medication
- Agreement to remain abstinent (refrain from heterosexual intercourse) or use
contraceptive measures, and agreement to refrain from donating sperm
Exclusion criteria
-Radiotherapy with a wide field of radiation within4 weeks before start of
study treatment -Major surgery(excl.placement of vascular access,transurethral
resection of prostate,bilateral orchiectomy,internal stents)within4 weeks of
start of study treatment -Brain metastases,or spinal cord compression(unless
spinal cord compression is asymptomatic, treated and stable and not requiring
steroids for at least4 weeks prior to start of study treatment) -Any of the
following cardiac criteria i.Mean resting correctedQT interval(QTc)>470msec
from3consecutiveECGs ii.Any clinically important abnormalities in rhythm,
conduction or morphology of restingECG iii.Any factors that increase the risk
ofQTc prolongation or risk of arrhythmic events such as heart failure,
hypokalaemia, potential for torsades de pointes, congenital longQTsyndrome,
family history of longQT syndrome or unexplained sudden death under40years of
age,orany concomitant medication known to prolong theQTinterval iv.Experience
of any of the following procedures or conditions in the preceding3months:
coronary artery bypass graft, vascular stent, myocardial infarction, unstable
angina pectoris, congestive heart failure NYHA Grade>=2 v.Symptomatic
hypotension -systolic bloodpressure<90mmHg and/or diastolic
bloodpressure<50mmHg vi.Haemodynamic instability
-Clinically significant abnormalities of glucose metabolism as defined by any
of the following i.Patients with diabetes mellitus(DM)type1 or DMtype2requiring
insulin treatment ii.HbA1c>=8.0%(63.9mmol/mol) -Inadequate bone marrow reserve
or organ function as demonstrated by laboratory values as specified in the
protocol -As judged by the investigator,any evidence of diseases(including
severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases,uncontrolled hypertension, history of
interstitial pneumonia/pneumonitis or interstitial disease,renal transplant and
active bleeding diseases),that makes it undesirable for the patient to
participate in the study or that would jeopardise compliance with the protocol
- Known to have active hepatitis BorCinfection;HIVwith a CD4+ T-cell
count<350cells/uL or a historyof an AIDS-defining opportunistic infection
within the past12months - Refractory nausea and vomiting,malabsorption
syndrome,chronic gastrointestinal diseases,inability to swallow the formulated
product or previous significant bowel resection,or other condition that would
preclude adequate absorption of capivasertib -Any other disease, finding that,
in the investigator*s opinion, gives reasonable suspicion of a disease or
condition that contra-indicates the use of an investigational drug,may affect
the interpretation of the results,render the patient at high risk from
treatment complications or interferes with obtaining informed consent.Evidence
of dementia,altered mental status,or any psychiatric condition that would
prohibit understanding or rendering of informed consent -Previous allogeneic
bone marrow transplant or solid organ transplant - History of another primary
malignancy except for malignancy treated with curative intent with no known
active disease>=2 years before the first dose of study intervention and of low
potential risk for recurrence. Exceptions adequately resected non-melanoma skin
cancer and curatively treated in situ disease - Persistent toxicities(CTCAE
Grade >=2)caused by previous anticancer therapy, excluding alopecia. Patients
with irreversible toxicity that is not reasonably expected to be exacerbated by
study intervention in the opinion of the investigator may be included(eg,
hearing loss) -Treatment with any of the following i.Prior chemotherapy
forCRPC. Chemotherapy for metastatic or localized HSPC(including docetaxel)is
allowed provided that chemotherapy was completed>= 6months before randomisation
and progression of the prostate cancer occurred >= 6months after the completion
of therapy. ii.Prior exposure to AKTinhibitors or PI3Kinhibitors iii.Any
investigational agents or study drugs from a previous clinical study within30
days or5 half-lives(whichever is longer)of the first dose of study treatment
iv.Any other immunotherapy, immunosuppressant medication(other than
corticosteroids)or anticancer agents(except ADT)within 3weeks of the first dose
of study treatment v.Strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome
P450(CYP)3A4 within2 weeks prior to the first dose of study treatment(3 weeks
for St John*s wort),
vi.Use of any live vaccine administration 30days prior to the initiation of the
study treatment, during and for at least 90days after the last dose of study
treatment
-Drugs known to significantly prolong the QTinterval and associated with
Torsade de Pointes within5 half-lives of the first dose of study treatment -
History of hypersensitivity to active or inactive excipients of
capivasertib,docetaxel, ordrugs with a similar chemical structure or class -Any
restriction or contraindication based on the local prescribing information that
would prohibit the use of docetaxel
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EU-CTR | CTIS2023-504996-26-00 |
EudraCT | EUCTR2021-005201-27-NL |
ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05348577 |
CCMO | NL80687.056.22 |