The assess the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization (PAE) with polyethylene glycol microspheres (PEGM) in patients with low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Reproductive neoplasms male benign
Synonym
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
To assess the effect (Δ IPSS) after 3 months of prostate artery embolization
(PAE) with polyethylene glycol microspheres (PEGM) in patients with low urinary
tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
Secondary outcome
Secondary parameters
- Assessment safety defined as adverse events:
o expected side-effects:
* e.g. pelvic pain, worsening of direct obstructive and irritative symptoms,
extension of inflammatory effect to adjacent symptoms, transient increase
urinary frequency, burning urethral pain.
o unexpected complications:
* e.g. vascular complication, non-targeted embolization, erectile dysfunction,
incontinence, retrograde ejaculation, urinary tract infection, bladder
necrosis, (acute) urinary retention, hematuria, rectorrhagia, hematospermia,
radiodermatitis, skincancer.
- Assessment during 12 months follow up; Δ IPSS, Δ prostate volume (PV), Δ
prostate specific antigen (PSA), Δ post void residual urine volume (PVR), Δ
Qmax, Δ IPSS, Δ erectile function score (IIEF) and Δ quality of life (Qualeffo).
- PAE costs
- Assessment of predictors of good clinical outcome e.g. Zonal Volumetry
index, number of nodules >= 2, percentage necrosis on MRI and Δ
Exploratory parameters
The off-line evaluation of the clinical performance of Philips EmboGuide in PAE
procedures (EmboGuide will not be used during all procedures)
a. Parameters related to the use of XperCT and EmboGuide:
i. Procedure time (defined as time between first exposure run and last exposure
run)
ii. Successful detection of prostatic artery (First time right, Manual
correction needed, Failed to detect)
iii. Accumulative procedure dose (Total DAP in Gy.cm2 )
Background summary
Benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most common pathologic entities
in men, affecting over 50% of men older than 60 years of age, and over 90% of
men older than 80 years (1-4) . Although this condition is benign, BPH may
cause low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). To objectively quantify LUTS in
patients the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) is used. BPH with LUTS
is generally treated conservatively with medical therapy. Although many
patients will demonstrate improvement, a substantial proportion will not
benefit from conservative therapy. Patients with symptoms refractory to medical
therapy are potential candidates for minimally invasive or surgical procedures.
The golden standard therapy is trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP),
with high success- and low morbidity-rates. However, in high volume BPH cases
the TURP success-rate drops, re-interventions are more often needed and a
higher (post-)procedural morbidity-rate is reported.(5). Therefore
open-prostatectomy, a more invasive treatment, in large volume BPH is needed.
Although open-prostatectomy demonstrates good clinical results it can be
related to serious major complications which can be a threat for the elderly
patient.
Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is a minimal therapy for patients with BPH
and LUTS with promising results. (6,7) As opposed to the former, the
efficacy-rates for PAE in high volume BPH are promising with only few reported
adverse events; side-effects and complications. (8,9) PAE is a valuable
treatment alternative to transurethral surgery in patients with symptomatic
BPH.
1. Garraway WM, Collins GN, Lee RJ. High prevalence of benign prostatic
hypertrophy in the community. Lancet. 1991;338(8765):469-471.
2. Wei JT, Calhoun E, Jacobsen SJ. Urologic diseases in america project: Benign
prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2008;179(5 Suppl):S75-80.
3. Guess HA, Arrighi HM, Metter EJ, Fozard JL. Cumulative prevalence of
prostatism matches the autopsy prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Prostate. 1990;17(3):241-246.
4. McVary KT. BPH: Epidemiology and comorbidities. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(5
Suppl):S122-8.
5. Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early
outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: A prospective multicenter
evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol. 2008;180(1):246-249.
6. Schreuder SM, Scholtens AE, Reekers JA, Bipat S. The role of prostatic
arterial embolization in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: A
systematic review. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(5):1198-1219.
7. Feng S, Tian Y, Liu W, et al. Prostatic arterial embolization treating
moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostate
hyperplasia: A meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(1):22-32.
8. Pisco JM, Bilhim T, Pinheiro LC, et al. Medium- and long-term outcome of
prostate artery embolization for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia:
Results in 630 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1115-1122.
9. Wang XY, Zong HT, Zhang Y. Efficacy and safety of prostate artery
embolization on lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic
hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Interv Aging.
2016;11:1609-1622.
Study objective
The assess the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization (PAE) with
polyethylene glycol microspheres (PEGM) in patients with low urinary tract
symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
Study design
Prospective single-arm cohort study.
Intervention
After out-patient urology consultation and informed consent, patients undergo
in-patient PAE. Before PAE all patients have blood examination (GFR, CBC,
creat, PSA, coagulation status) and corrected accordingly. Bilateral puncture
of the common femoral artery is performed, placing a 4F catheter in the
contralateral internal iliac artery for diagnostic imaging (DSA) in
cranio-/oblique (10°/40°) projection (± 3D angiography and/or coned beam CT)
in order to identify the main branches and the origin of the prostatic artery
on each side. A micro catheter is selectively placed distally in the
prostatic artery. In case of collateral pathways to non-targeted areas, a
proximal coiling of these branches will be performed. Embolization using
polyethylene glycol microspheres (PEGM), sized 400µm and/or 600 µm
(HydroPearl®). The embolization end point is until stasis of the contrast is
achieved.
Study burden and risks
vascular complication, e.g. inguinal hematoma (1.9%),
non-targeted embolization, e.g. bladder necrosis, <0.1%
erectile dysfunction, (?%)
incontinence, (?%)
retrograde ejaculation, (?%)
urinary tract infection, (2.9%)
(acute) urinary retention, (9.5%)
hematuria, (6.8%)
rectorrhagia, (4.5%)
hematospermia, (5.8%)
stochastic en deterministic effects due to exposure of per-procedural X-ray.
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg 5022GC
NL
Hilvarenbeekseweg 60
Tilburg 5022GC
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
men > 40 years with urinary tract symptoms due to BPH, refractory to medical
therapy
prostate size > 50cc measured by trans-rectal US and/or CT and MRI
IPSS score>18
Qol >2
Qmax <12
Exclusion criteria
Prostate/bladder malignancy
neurogenic bladder
detrusor failure
hyper-/hypoactive bladder
urethral strictures
dysfunction/contraction bladder neck
bladder calculi of diverticula
renal insufficiency (GFR <60ml/min)
prostatitis
interstitial cystitis
severe atherosclerosis with tortuosity of afferent arteries and/or allergy to
intravenous contrast
Patient not allowed in MRI
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
CCMO | NL63097.028.18 |
OMON | NL-OMON20499 |