No registrations found.
ID
Source
Brief title
Health condition
Psychological complaints for which is referred to outpatient treatment
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
In this study the DSI will be found to be valid if the level of agreement between the DSI and the SCID-5-S at both the classification level as at the disorder level has a Cohen's Kappa of 0.7 or more.
Secondary outcome
In this study we will measure the time it takes to administare the DSI and the SCID-5-S and we will compare which interview takes more time.
Background summary
Varies studies have shown that in routine clinical practice, the reported levels of interrater reliability for classifications according to the DSM (APA, 2013) is low. Therefore, the use of semi-structured interviews is advised to guarantee the validity of a classification according to the DSM. The disadvantage of most (semi-) structured interviews is that they are long, contain many questions and that extensive training is required to conduct them properly. The DSI is a shorter and digital (semi-) structured questionnaire. However, this has not yet been assessed for validity. In this study, the criterion validity of the DSI will be assessed by administering the DSI as well as the SCID-5-S by each subjects in the same week.
In this study, the criterion validity of the DSI is assessed, with the following research questions:
1) Is the DSI sufficiently valid for setting a DSM classification at category level?
2) Is the DSI sufficiently valid for setting a DSM classification at the disorder level?
3) Is there indeed a difference in the time it takes to administer the DSI and the SCID-5-S?
Study objective
To detemine if the DSI is valid.
Study design
Two time points within one week
Intervention
With each participants the DSI and the SCID-5-S will be adminstered within one week.
Inclusion criteria
Anyone who qualifies for outpatient treatment.
Exclusion criteria
HSK has certain exclusion criteria for entering treatment. These are: schizophrenia, psychosis or delusional disorder; serious disorders in and through the use of substances such as alcohol and drugs; bipolar disorder as main reporting complaint; serious personality problems; eating disorders and eating problems; non-congenital brain injury (NAH) and/or IQ <80; developmental disorders: attention deficiency/hyperactivity disorder (AD(H)D), autism spectrum disorder (ASD); severe suicidality and/or crisis sensitivity and language barrier. It is not always clear in advance that a client, referred for treatment, meets one or more of the above disorders or criteria. In other words, these are not exclusion criteria for the study as such, but for the subsequent treatment. However, these clients may be referred less.
Design
Recruitment
IPD sharing statement
Plan description
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
| Register | ID |
|---|---|
| NTR-new | NL9743 |
| Other | Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek regio Arnhem-Nijmegen : 2020-6308 |