6 results
The main objective of the present study is to investigate whether the ORSIRO coronary stent is non-inferior compared to the Xience coronary stent in patients with total coronary occlusions.
The objective of the ABSORB PHYSIOLOGY is to evaluate the following in participants undergoing coronary artery scaffolding/stenting for significant coronary artery disease:• The acute (post-implantation) effect of an implanted BVS or mDES on…
To test the non-inferiority of the Synergy* abluminal coated everolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Boston Scientific compared to the Nobori* abluminal coated biolimus eluting stent with bio-absorbable polymer from Terumo in the…
To establish the MaximumTolerated Dose, Dose Limiting Toxicities, and the safety profile of BMS-833923 administered in combination with cisplatin and capecitabine as first-line therapy. To describe preliminary evidence of tumor response as measured…
Aim of this study is measuring the effects of locoregional anaesthesia in EDS patients and comparing these effects with those in a healthy control group. The results of this study can be used to make a more valid choice for the type of anaesthesia…
This protocol will compare clinical outcomes of the SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE drug-eluting stents in a broad patient and lesion population and will gain substantial additional information on patients in a real world setting. These data will also provide…