50 results
The first objective is to evaluate the safety of cetuximab in patients with scleroderma associated PAH. The secondary objective is to assess efficacy.
To demonstrate superiority of XP chemotherapy regimen plus cetuximab versus XP alone asfirst-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in terms of PFS. To assess cetuximab + XP versus XP alone with respect to: OS; overall response; QoL; safety.
To assess in term pregnant women with an unfavourable cervix (Bishop score < 6, Appendix1) the effectiveness of induction of labour with a transcervical Foley catheter as compared to induction with prostaglandins.
The aim of the study is to assess the feasibility of combined treatment of Cisplatin, Cetuximab and concurrent RT and to get insight in the clinical efficacy (for study schedule, see flow chart 1). The first phase of the study will mainly focus on…
In this study we want to determine the activity and safety of concurrent interruption of the MAPK and PI3K pathways by EGFR and mTOR inhibition in patients with metatastatic pancreatic cancer
The primary objective is to select one of two platinum strategies to be used in this regimen for use as experimental arm in Phase III. This is a screening feasibility study addressing purely investigational approaches.
Is priming of the cervix, as part of induction of labour:* At home cost-effective and safe compared to the hospital?* with oral misoprostol cost-effective and safe compared to a Foley catheter?
The main purpose of this pilot study is to investigate the feasibility of fluorescence imaging using cetuximab-IRDye800CW for intraoperative margin assessment in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
This study will compare sequential mifepristone and misoprostol treatment versus misoprostol treatment alone, which is currently the standard medical treatment in the Netherlands.
Primary:- To evaluate the antitumor activity of the combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab by assessing the confirmed overall response rate (cORR) by local radiologist/investigator assessment in adult subjects with previously…
PART I: 1) to demonstrate 89Zr-cetuximab uptake in non-hepatic tumor lesions at standard dose or at cohort wise increased cetuximab doses (dose escalation). 2) to determine the association between 89Zr-cetuximab uptake in non-hepatic tumor lesions…
Primary objectiveTo determine whether aprotinin can reverse the increased postoperative blood loss, induced by dual anti-platelet therapy in elective non-complex cardiac surgery.Secondary objectiveTo determine whether aprotinin reduces transfusion…
Primary ObjectivesPart A: RO6874281 Dose Escalation as a Single AgentThe primary objectives for this study are as follows:* To describe the safety and tolerability profile of RO6874281 as a single agent* To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD…
The main objective of this study is to determine whether a single neoadjuvant gift of anti-EGFR mAb, administered 48 hours prior to local treatment of colorectal liver metastases, reduces the number of CTCs. Secondary endpoints are determination of…
Primary objectives Phase Ib: To estimate the MTD and/or RP2D of LGX818 in combination with cetuximab ± BYL719. Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Phase II: To compare the efficacy of the dual (LGX818, cetuximab) and triple (LGX818, BYL719…
Feasibility
Primary: Phase Ib: To estimate the MTD(s) and/or RP2D(s) of the triple combination of WNT974, LGX818 andcetuximab in patients with BRAFV600-mutant CRC harboring Wnt pathway mutations.Phase II: To estimate the preliminary anti-tumor activity of the…
The main aim is to test whether cetuximab-IRDye800CW is a reliable marker for residual tumor remnants in resection margins after surgical removal of head and neck cancer. To increase the specificity of cetuximab-800CW, a specific frozen section can…
The purpose of the current study is to determine the feasibility of using MFGS using Cetuximab-800CW as an intraoperative margin assessment tool for penile carcinoma.
Primary Objectives1) To compare the Progression Free Survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in first line recurrent / metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) subjects, treated…