Search for a trial

Safety and Effectiveness using DEXmedetomidine sedation versus Propofol/Alfentanil sedation
during oesophagus interventions.
(SEDEX)

The aim of this study is to determine the patients* and endoscopists experiences and patients* safety with different sedation protocols.

A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTRE, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH PROPOFOL FOR CONTINUOUS SEDATION OF VENTILATED PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Primary objective:The study has hierarchical co-primary objectives to demonstrate that:- Firstly: dexmedetomidine is at least as effective as sedation with propofol and daily sedation stops, in maintaining a target depth of sedation in ventilated…

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol in the awake implantation of a neuromodulative system.

The purpose of this study is to observe the usability of dexmedetomidine compared to the standard therapy (propofol) and to determine the overall satisfaction of the patient.

Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety trial of remimazolam (CNS7056) compared with propofol for intravenous anaesthesia during elective surgery

Primary ObjectiveThis is a confirmatory trial to establish non-inferior efficacy of remimazolam compared with propofol for induction and maintenance of GA for the purpose of elective surgery in patients classes III and IV based on the American…

A Randomized, Single-blind, Propofol-controlled Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam in General Anesthesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery, including Follow-up Sedation in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit / Intensive Care Unit

The objectives are:* to show non-inferiority of remimazolam compared with propofol in terms of successful maintenance of sedation defined as a Narcotrend index of 60 or less during at least 85% of the maintenance time without the use of rescue…