Search for a trial

A randomised, double-blind, active-controlled parallel group study to evaluate the effect of 52 weeks of once daily treatment of orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination compared with tiotropium on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation in patients with severe to very severe COPD.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate that once daily treatment with tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination will reduce the number of exacerbations over tiotropium 5 µg monotherapy.A secondary aim of the study is an assessment of a…

A randomized, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group design, multi-center trial to compare the efficacy and safety of 2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium Inhalation Solution delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler with Tiotropium inhalation capsules 18 µg delivered by the HandiHaler®.

To compare the efficacy and safety of 2.5 µg and 5 µg Tiotropium Inhalation Solution delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler with Tiotropium inhalation capsules 18 µg delivered by the HandiHaler®.

A randomised, double-blind, parallel group study to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks of once daily treatment of orally inhaled tiotropium + olodaterol fixed dose combination (2.5 µg / 5 µg; 5 µg / 5 µg) (delivered by the RESPIMAT) compared with the individual components (2.5 µg and 5 µg tiotropium, 5 µg olodaterol) (delivered by the RESPIMAT) in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) [TOnadoTM 1]

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of 52 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium plus olodaterol fixed dose combination compared with the individual components tiotropium and olodaterol (delivered by…

A 64-week treatment, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active controlled study to evaluate the effect of QVA149 (110/50 *g o.d.) vs NVA237 (50 *g o.d.) and open-label tiotropium (18 *g o.d.) on COPD exacerbations in patients with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (CQVA149A2304)

Primary objective: To demonstrate that QVA149 (110/50 *g o.d.) is superior to NVA237 (50 *g o.d.) with regard to the rate of moderate to severe COPD exacerbations during 64 weeks of treatmentSecondary objectives: To demonstrate that QVA149 (110/50 *…

A 52-week treatment, multi-center, randomized, doubleblind, double dummy, parallel-group, active controlled study to compare the effect of QVA149 (indacaterol maleate / glycopyrronium bromide) with salmeterol/fluticasone on the rate of exacerbations in subjects with moderate to very severe COPD (CQVA149A2318)

Primary objective: To demonstrate that QVA149 (110/50 *g o.d.) is at least non-inferior to salmeterol/fluticasone (50/500 *g b.i.d.) in terms of rate of COPD exacerbations.Secondary objectives: Superiority in terms of exacerbation rate. Time to…

A study to compare the efficacy and safety of once daily QVA149 vs. the once daily concurrent administration of QAB149 plus NVA237 in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CQVA149A2326)

Primary objective: To evaluate the non-inferiority of QVA149 110/50 µg qd as compared to concurrentadministration of QAB149 150 µg qd plus NVA237 50 µg qd in terms of its effect on trough FEV1 (mean of 23 h 15 min and 23 h 45 min post-dose)…

A Randomised, Double Blind, Double Dummy, Parallel Group Study Comparing UMEC/VI (A Fixed Combination Of Umeclidinium and Vilanterol) With Tiotropium In COPD Subjects Who Continue To Have Symptoms on Tiotropium (DB2116960)

Efficacy and safety.

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, 4 period complete cross-over study to compare the effect on lung function of 6 weeks once daily treatment with orally inhaled tiotropium+olodaterol fixed dose combination delivered by the Respimat® inhaler vs. 6 weeks twice daily treatment with fluticasone propionate+salmeterol fixed dose combination delivered by the Accuhaler® in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Compare if once daily laba/lama treatment with two different dosages shows the same or better result on the 24 hr lungfunction than twice daily treatment of two different dosages with ICS/laba treatment. .

DB2116134: A randomized, multi-center, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol over 12 weeks in subjects with COPD

Efficacy and safety.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume reduction with endobronchial valves using best responder criteria in patients with severe COPD

To investigate both the clinical and economical(-healthcare evaluation) improvement of BVR using best responder criteria in patients with severe COPD.

A phase III, 52 week, randomized, double-blind, 3-arm parallel group study, comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the fixed dose triple combination FF/UMEC/VI with the fixed dose dual combinations of FF/VI and UMEC/VI, all administered once-daily in the morning via a dry powder inhaler in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Primary: To evaluate the efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI to reduce the annual rate of moderate and severe exacerbations compared with dual therapy of FF/VI or UMEC/VI in subjects with COPD. Secondary: Long term safety and other efficacy parameters.

A Randomized, Sham Controlled, Double-blinded, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of the VentFree Respiratory Muscle Stimulator to Assist Ventilator Weaning in Critically Ill Patients

The primary objective of the trial is to determine whether abdominal FES reduces the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult patients compared to a sham control.The secondary objectives are to determine whether abdominal…