The primary objective of the study is to prospectively determine whether fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity is preventable by dose adjustment prior to start of the first administration based on the polymorphic status of the DPYD*2A polymorphism in…
ID
Source
Brief title
Condition
- Other condition
- Malignant and unspecified neoplasms gastrointestinal NEC
- Purine and pyrimidine metabolism disorders
Synonym
Health condition
mammacarcinoma
Research involving
Sponsors and support
Intervention
Outcome measures
Primary outcome
Primary outcome parameter is safety of the treatment of DPYD*2A mutant patients
with capecitabine or 5-FU. Toxicity outcome will be monitored according to
NCI-CTC.
Secondary outcome
Secondary outcome parameters are:
- costs, to determine whether this strategy is cost-saving, which will be
assessed by an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis.
- to assess an individual treatment algorithm for DPYD*2A mutant patients for
capecitabine and 5-FU.
- to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine and 5-FU in
DPYD*2A mutant patients.
- to perform a DPD-activity measurement in patients with the DPYD*2A muation
- assessment of the toxicity in wild type patients for DPYD*2A, who have been
prospectively screened prior to start of therapy and did actually receive a
treatment with fluoropyrimidine drugs, by investigation of the patient files
- statusonderzoek naar toxiciteit in wild type patienten voor DPYD*2A, die in
het kader van deze studie voorafgaand de therapie gegenotypeerd zijn en
daadwerkelijk zijn gestart met een fluoropyrimidinebehandeling.
Background summary
Fluoropyrimidines are a group of widely prescribed anticancer agents. Although
5-FU is in clinical use for 50 years, it remains a drug with poorly predictable
severe toxicity, which in some cases is fatal. An important factor for
fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity is polymorphism in dihydropyrimidine
dehydrogenase (DPD), the enzyme that metabolizes 85% of 5-FU to inactive
compounds.
The polymorphism IVS14+1G>A (DPYD*2A) has been shown to have a great impact on
DPD-activity. Retrospectively, the DPYD*2A mutation is found in about 25% of
all patients who developed severe hematological and/or gastro-intestinal
toxicity after full-dose treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU.
This single nucleotide polymorphism is a point mutation, which leads to
complete skipping of exon 14 during pre-mRNA splicing, resulting in a protein
with absent activity. In the Netherlands DPYD*2A has a heterozygous frequency
of 1.8%. It is reported that heterozygote individuals for DPYD*2A have a 50%
reduction in DPD-activity, whereas in homozygotes DPD is complete deficient.
The reduced or absent capacity to metabolize 5-FU by DPD, leads to a higher and
longer exposure of 5-FU to the body, which in turn causes typical
fluoropyrimidine (non-)hematological toxicity such as bone marrow suppression,
leucopenia, diarrhea and mucositis. Prolonged periods of hospitalization of
several weeks are indicated for the treatment of the toxicity.
We develop a rapid screening method for DPYD*2A, which is suitable for routine
assessment prior to therapy. Other methods described in literature such as
activity measurements in leucocytes or determination of the uracil /
dihydrouracil ratio in urine for predicting DPD activity are time-consuming,
highly variable and above all not predictive, thereby not suitable for clinical
practise. There is an unmet need for other methods for predicting
DPD-deficiency.
The aim is to demonstrate that total number and degree of toxicity, and related
costs for the treatment of the toxicity, can be prevented by adaptive dosing in
DPYD*2A mutant individuals.
Study objective
The primary objective of the study is to prospectively determine whether
fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity is preventable by dose adjustment prior to
start of the first administration based on the polymorphic status of the
DPYD*2A polymorphism in DPYD, in comparison with retrospectively determined
full-dose treated heterozygous patients and to determine whether this strategy
is cost-saving.
Secondary objectives of the study are to validate an individualized treatment
algorithm for capecitabine and 5-FU therapy based on the polymorphic status of
DPYD*2A and to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of capecitabine and 5-FU in
DPYD*2A mutants given reduced dosages of the respective drugs.
Study design
Prospective, clinical, non-randomized, pharmacogenetic, -kinetic and *economic
non-randomized safety analysis in patients treated with capecitabine or 5-FU.
Intervention
The polymorphic status of DPYD*2A will be assessed prospectively, prior to
fluoropyrimidine treatment. Wild-type patients will drop out of the study after
determination. Hetero- and homozygous mutant patients are given a dose
reduction of at least 50% and 85%, respectively. If the first 2 cycles are
fully completed and considered safe, doses may be increased in subsequent
cycles.
Further dose reductions may be applied at any time.
Study burden and risks
4 ml of blood will be obtained prior to start of therapy for the assessment of
DPYD*2A status. In DPYD*2A mutant patients a maximum of 12 plasma samples (8 ml
blood / sample) will be obtained on day 1 of course number 1. This will require
only one extra venapuncture for the whole blood sampling procedure on that day.
If patients receive a dose modification in any further cycle, the same blood
sampling procedure will be performed on day one of the respective course. Any
risk hereby is negligible.
Plesmanlaan 121
1066 CX Amsterdam
NL
Plesmanlaan 121
1066 CX Amsterdam
NL
Listed location countries
Age
Inclusion criteria
- Patient is considered for treatment with capecitabine or 5-FU
- Age 18 years or older
- Able and willing to undergo blood sampling for pharmacogenetic and pharmacokinetic analysis
- Life expectancy more than 2 months allowing adequate follow up of toxicity evalution and antitumor activity
- Minimal acceptable safety laboratory values
- WHO performance status of 0 - 2
- No radio- or chemotherapy within the last 3 weeks prior to study entry
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with known alcoholism, drug addiction and/or psychotic disorders in the history that are not suitable for adequate follow up.
- Women who are pregnant, breast feeding or women of childbearing potential who refuse to use a reliable contraceptive method throughout the study.
Design
Recruitment
Medical products/devices used
Followed up by the following (possibly more current) registration
No registrations found.
Other (possibly less up-to-date) registrations in this register
No registrations found.
In other registers
Register | ID |
---|---|
EudraCT | EUCTR2007-000412-82-NL |
CCMO | NL15956.031.07 |